Brands

This is the brands of the product. The main brand, generally clearly displayed on the front pack, should be entered first. A product can have other brands:

• when a product is a brand sold by a big company: Actimel is sold by Danone, see https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/4009700036810/actimel-granatapfel
• when a product is sold with its brand translated in two languages:
  • Nature Valley is sometimes written Val Nature; see https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/0065633280267/barre-granola-erable-et-cassonade-nature-valley
  • No Name is also written Sans nom; represent 100+ products for No Name and 170+ products for Sans Nom.

When a product has more than one brand, the first brand in the field is taken as the main brand.

There's no taxonomy for brands for the moment, so just do your best and don't waste too much time to enter brands.

Data issues

Some brands are difficult to read:

• is it Coop, coop, COOP, CO OP?

Some brands can be related to different companies in different countries:

• San Miguel
• Star
• Walkers seems to represent 3 different brands (1, 2 and 3)

Some brands are related to a common name or an ingredient, which can be confusing:

• Racines (means "roots" in French)
• La Truffe (means "the truffle" in French)
• Pure Protein
• Best Choice is a brand, not a tagline
• Great Value also
• The Belgian, often entered Belgian; it produces many false positive from our AI.

Brands containing an apostrophe are often missing this one:

• Lay's often written Lays
• Kellogg's often written Kelloggs or something else
• Sar'Ocean.

Brands are changing sometimes. How to deal with that?

Some particular cases for a brand

• A brand can contain only numbers, such as 1664, 1883 or 365.
• A brand can contain quotes, such as The Muffin "Mam" Inc
• A brand can contain &, such as M&M's
• A brand can contain commas, such as Williams, West & Witt's Products; https://world.openfoodfacts.org/brand/williams-west-witt-s-prods
• A brand can have a sub-brand containing its own name: Sainsbury's use a brand called By Sainsbury's.

Some particular cases for a product

• A product can have more than 2 brands; eg:
  • Coop, in Switzerland, can add up to three brands on a product: Betty Bossi, Karma and Coop in this product; they justify it: "We offer a wide range of own-label brands and brand worlds." (source)
  • In this product, Lipton belongs to Unilever but this product is distributed by Pepsico

Implementation in Open Food Facts

In the database, this field is called brands.

See issues related to brands.

Preventing OFF AI to detect some false brands: see brand_taxonomy_blacklist.txt.

Help to collect brands

The IA of Open Food Facts, called Robotoff, is trying to identify brands. The annotations made by Robotoff are provided to users, asking them to answer to a simple question. There are also used by Hunger Game. Everyone can use Hunger Game, but be careful to the issues mentioned in this current page.

• on 2020-10-29, there were 43200 annotations and 22748 resting
• on 2020-11-17, there were 46911 annotations and 22720 resting

Taxonomy encoding

An overview of the encoding used in the brands taxonomy:

• blocks/white lines - a single brand is defined by a block of text and are separated by white lines;
• definition - a single line defines the brand in a specific language, an attribute, etc. Each line starts with a name followed by parameters and separated by a colon
• parameters:
  • parent (<zz:) - a reference to another (parent) brand. Thus any attributes shared between parent and child only have to be specified in the parent;
  • key (zz:) - an unique is required, so that we can distinguish between brands with the same name;
  • default (xx:) - a default value to be used for any language that is not specifically listed;
  • language (e.g. ru:) - the brand-name in the language ru. A brand might be defined in multiple languages as needed, with a single line for each language. For instance the ru: might be used to specify a brand in Cyrillic. Sometimes also country specific brands are required.
  • attributes - each brand can have one or more attributes
    • barcodeprefix:en: - the first 8(?) numbers of the barcode that belong to the brand. With this brands can be automatically assigned to a barcode. Also the barcodes of existing products can be checked;
    • wikipedia:en: - the full link to a page, which explains the brand(!!!). Note that brands are not well available on wikipedia;
    • wikidata:en: - the identifaction of the wikidata entry for the brand(!!). Note that brands are not well available on wikidata;
    • brand_owner_opencorporates:xx: - an identification of the probable brand owner/distributor on opencorporates. It is not always clear what should be written down here.
    • idea: local customer service address (one for each country where the product is distributed, and a generic one)
    • idea: eu trademark - maybe only useful for name trademarks? (not logo's). But not relevant to the consumer.
    • idea: stores - the stores where the brand is sold. Maybe better to create a store taxonomy and link from there to brands?

Example

zz:isolabio
xx:Isola Bio
website:en:https://www.isolabio.com/en/
production_company:en:Abafoods s.r.l.
brand_owner:en:ABAFOODS S.R.L. - Via Cà Mignola Nuova, 1775 - I-45021 Badia Polesine (Rovigo)
brand_owner_opencorporates:XX:not listed

1. 106 products @2022-04-23
   

zz:latrappe
xx:La Trappe
website:nl:https://nl.latrappetrappist.com/nl/nl.html
brand_owner:en:Abdij O.L.V. van Koningshoeven - 3 Eindhovenseweg - NL-5056 RP BERKEL-ENSCHOT
brand_owner_opencorporates:BE:0838355558
production_company:nl:Bierbrouwerij De Koningshoeven NV
production_company_opencorporates:NL:18042956
wikidata:en:Q590921

1. 11 products @2022-04-23
   

Questions / Issues

• company structure - do we want to list (and research) all the relationships between owners, marketing companies, etc. I would suggest that we do NOT and limit ourselves to the brands and brand owner (and maybe the production company);
• overkill - it is very tempting to add al kinds details for owners, etc. The actual owners of the product, brand, etc, do not seem useful to the consumer. We just should provide links to third parties for this kind information. I.e. wikipedia, wikidata,, opencorporates, ipo europe, ...