3,543
edits
Eco-score transport - en: Difference between revisions
→Base calculation method
| Line 195: | Line 195: | ||
It is possible to use a percentage bonus/malus system, where the percentages are applied directly to the ACV-numbers. I tried to map the eco-score approach against the percentages approach. Checkout the [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18Rln2Ku48d2qJ9TQf-FZ6_0OR-9eg1DO4Sh4cmzRgI0/edit?usp=sharing spreadsheet] (still needs more work, eco-score allows to downgrade a product with no ACV). Thus you can map a malus against a percentage, in order to get things going. | It is possible to use a percentage bonus/malus system, where the percentages are applied directly to the ACV-numbers. I tried to map the eco-score approach against the percentages approach. Checkout the [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18Rln2Ku48d2qJ9TQf-FZ6_0OR-9eg1DO4Sh4cmzRgI0/edit?usp=sharing spreadsheet] (still needs more work, eco-score allows to downgrade a product with no ACV). Thus you can map a malus against a percentage, in order to get things going. | ||
If more information is available, it is possible to apply a more detailed change to the ACV, instead of a percentage. For instance for the impact of transport. For this it is possible to calculate the impact in gram CO<sub>2</sub>. And this can directly be linked to the listed CO<sub>2</sub> impact of the ACV. Unfortunately the CO<sub>2</sub> can not be derived from the PEF, so really the original data should be adapted. | If more information is available, it is possible to apply a more detailed change to the ACV, instead of a percentage. For instance for the impact of transport. For this it is possible to calculate the impact in gram CO<sub>2</sub>. And this can directly be linked to the listed CO<sub>2</sub> impact of the ACV. Unfortunately the CO<sub>2</sub> can not be derived from the PEF, so really the original data should be adapted (I have seen fractions of 10-40%). | ||
=== Transparancy === | === Transparancy === | ||