3,543
edits
Eco-score recycling - en: Difference between revisions
→Upstream
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
* [https://recyclingnetwerk.org/2018/06/07/factcheck-werkelijke-recyclagecijfers-zijn-lager-dan-wat-fost-plus-beweert/ Recycling Network Factcheck] | * [https://recyclingnetwerk.org/2018/06/07/factcheck-werkelijke-recyclagecijfers-zijn-lager-dan-wat-fost-plus-beweert/ Recycling Network Factcheck] | ||
==== Upstream ==== | ==== Upstream ==== | ||
The list of upstream materials on the eco-score page, only has a few materials, which are affected by a recycling component (Acier, Aluminium, Verre, Carton/Papier, PET, plastique (autre)). For the others the given numbers can be transposed to other countries right away. | |||
We need numbers for the usage of recycled materials in new packaging. So not the recycled percentage in general. To find these numbers I looked at the specific industries: | We need numbers for the usage of recycled materials in new packaging. So not the recycled percentage in general. To find these numbers I looked at the specific industries: | ||
# paper - [http://www.cobelpa.be Cobelpa]. The number seems to 59% (Utilisation rate (Recovered Paper utilisation as a % of paper & board production); | # paper - [http://www.cobelpa.be Cobelpa]. The number seems to 59% (Utilisation rate (Recovered Paper utilisation as a % of paper & board production); | ||