951
edits
Data quality: Difference between revisions
Refactoring
(Big refactoring (to be continued)) |
(Refactoring) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Data quality at Open Food Facts is guided by 3 main principles: | |||
* Quality does not make sense for itself: quality depends on usages. | * Quality does not make sense for itself: quality depends on usages. | ||
* No database at all can pretend to zero-default. | * We always try to favor ease of use and ease of collection. Data quality control, data verification and data fix should never be an obstacle to data gathering. | ||
* No database at all can pretend to zero-default. With more than 2 700 000 products, there are quality concerns. Data quality is done on a "best effort" basis. The effort on data quality includes measuring quality, setting objectives, publishing them and implementing them. | |||
These principles and our high level objectives are described in this short document (~5 pages)which you should read at first if you want to go further: | |||
https://link.openfoodfacts.org/data-quality | |||
== | == Measures == | ||
We have started an initiative to measure and publish continuously some data quality stats. We have created a specific page dedicated to [[data quality stats]]. | |||
== How to help? == | == How to help? == | ||
| Line 36: | Line 37: | ||
=== Data quality measurement === | === Data quality measurement === | ||
See [[data quality stats]]. | |||
=== Quality facets === | === Quality facets === | ||