Jump to content

Data quality: Difference between revisions

Few updates
(Refactoring)
(Few updates)
Line 1: Line 1:
Data quality at Open Food Facts is guided by 3 main principles:
Data quality at Open Food Facts is guided by '''3 main principles''':
* Quality does not make sense for itself: quality depends on usages.
* Quality does not make sense for itself: quality depends on usages.
* We always try to favor ease of use and ease of collection. Data quality control, data verification and data fix should never be an obstacle to data gathering.
* We always try to favor ease of use and ease of collection. Data quality control, data verification and data fix should never be an obstacle to data gathering.
* No database at all can pretend to zero-default. With more than 2 700 000 products, there are quality concerns. Data quality is done on a "best effort" basis. The effort on data quality includes measuring quality, setting objectives, publishing them and implementing them.
* No database at all can pretend to zero-default. With more than 2,900,000 products, there are quality concerns. Data quality is done on a "best effort" basis. The effort on data quality includes measuring quality, setting objectives, publishing them and implementing them.
These principles and our high level objectives are described in this short document (~5 pages)which you should read at first if you want to go further:
These principles and our high level objectives are described in the following short document, which you should read at first if you want to go further:


https://link.openfoodfacts.org/data-quality  
https://link.openfoodfacts.org/data-quality